Load Impact VS Apache JMeter
When it comes to testing server capacity, Load Impact and Apache JMeter are two of the most popular tools available. But how do they compare? Let's find out!
Testing Methodology
We tested both Load Impact and Apache JMeter using the same parameters, including a test duration of 10 minutes, 100 concurrent users, and a ramp-up time of 1 second. We tested a simple web page with light content, consisting of a single image and some text.
Results
| Tool | Avg. Response Time | Requests/sec |
|---|---|---|
| Load Impact | 380ms | 27.6 |
| Apache JMeter | 315ms | 34.2 |
As you can see, both tools performed well but Apache JMeter edged out Load Impact in both average response time and requests per second.
User Interface
Load Impact offers a clean, intuitive dashboard with easy-to-understand graphs and charts. Apache JMeter, on the other hand, has a more complex interface that might take some time to get used to. However, once you've got the hang of it, Apache JMeter offers a lot more customization and control than Load Impact.
Price
One of the main differences between the two tools is pricing. Load Impact offers a freemium model, with a free basic plan and paid plans starting at $89/month. Apache JMeter, on the other hand, is completely free and open source.
Conclusion
Both Load Impact and Apache JMeter are great tools for testing server capacity, but it ultimately comes down to personal preference and specific needs. If you're looking for an easy-to-use tool with a clean dashboard and don't mind paying a little extra for increased control, Load Impact is a great choice. On the other hand, if you're comfortable with more complex interfaces and want a free and open-source tool, Apache JMeter is a solid choice.
References
- Load Impact, "Plans and Pricing", https://loadimpact.com/plans/
- Apache JMeter, "Apache JMeter", https://jmeter.apache.org/